Marmot vs. Patagonia: Which Brand is Better in 2020?
It’s a pleasant summer night and you are out camping under the moonlight. Suddenly it starts raining, and you take shelter inside your tent.
You never expected it to rain, but that’s fate, it’s raining now and you can’t control it! What you can control is the quality of the camping tent you get, and the place from where you chose to buy it.
Be it traveling, hiking, or any other outdoor activities, the context remains the same. You need valuable products from a company you can trust, for keeping you warm, cozy, and safe.
Marmot and Patagonia are considerably two of the most well-known brands in the market. But Marmot vs. Patagonia, which is better than the other? You can decide for yourself through this article.
A company that was formed by outdoor adventure enthusiasts themselves, Tom Boyce, David Huntley, Eric Reynolds, they know their market from top to bottom and develop high-quality products.
In 1974, the company initially started selling sweaters, down vests, sleeping bags and trained other individuals to cross-country ski during the winters. Over the years, the company has grown by leaps and bounds.
Now it caters to a wide variety of segments, such as manufacturing and selling gears for camping, hiking, climbing, bouldering, alpine, and ice climbing as well.
The very first three down sleeping bag that they designed in 1974 was tested at -45 degree F, and known to be the warmest bag in the market. So, you can imagine the product’s caliber they would be manufacturing now in 2020 with the use of advanced technology.
That being said, their website is quite transparent and you can see the number of technologies they have in their bucket. It just doesn’t matter whether you are out in cold, heat, wind, or water, they have an applied science for every problem. And so the outdoor fanatic in you can have the “complete experience”.
Founded by Yvon Chouinard in 1973, around the same time as Marmot. An environmentalist, mountain climber, and surfer by passion, and an entrepreneur by profession for as long as he can remember.
Since 1958, Chouinard used to sell climbing pitons made out of scrap metals, which he manufactured in his parent’s back garden garage. He always had a keen on all things outdoors.
Since the beginning, his products such as chrome-molybdenum steel pitons were a popular choice among his customers. Unlike the product’s counterparts in the market back then, these could be re-used multiple times.
The company serves fly fishing and kitesurfing community along with the other climbing, biking, and running activities as well. A fierce advocate for the environment, climate change, and other things troubling our planet, their belief is grounded and based on the founder’s principles and vision.
Marmot versus Patagonia
Both the company store a wide range of jackets specifically built for different sports activities. The prices of these jackets depend on the type of activity you are buying for.
At Marmot, the casual everyday jackets/sweatshirts start at $68 whereas in Patagonia it starts at $89. When it comes to rainwear, Marmot products begin at $90, as compared to $129 for Patagonia. These are the lowest priced products found in their catalog of jackets.
The costliest jacket of Marmot, men’s alpinist is priced at $645, and $599 for Frozen range jackets of Patagonia’s.
When it comes to top and bottom wears of both the company, the cheapest products stand at $13-34 and $32, and their costliest range from $400 to 700$, for Marmot and Patagonia respectively.
On the equipment front, sleeping bags start at $60 for Marmot and $167 for Patagonia. The price difference stays the same for other types of equipment as well.
Now, as you might have noticed, in general Patagonia is costlier than Marmot, and there’s a reason for it. Patagonia is an environment-conscious brand and it has been that way since the inception. The majority of the materials used in their products are recycled and reused, to reduce the wastage of fibers.
They are one of the first and few outdoor activities appeal brands who strive in reducing their carbon footprints while at the same time developing exceptional products.
That brings us to the product quality.
Marmot faced a huge number of challenges in its first twenty-year in business. The initial jump provided by marketing in Clint Eastwood’s movie didn’t last long, and soon they faced a plateau.
All those years, as days went by, one thing the company focused on and kept at its core is its product quality. They never let their standard decrease for reducing the prices, and today it reflects on the type of gears they manufacture.
While Patagonia does use materials that are more eco-friendlier in nature than Marmot, that does not in anyways hamper their make-up.
On this front, nothing is differentiating both the company from one another. And rest assured, you need not worry about rain leaking inside your tent on your camping expeditions with either of the brands.
Even though both the brands were founded at about the same time, in this regard, Patagonia has been able to reach more eyes than Marmot.
One of the prime reasons is their ethos, which has never changed or even blinked an eye. The company’s mission has always been laser-sharp towards developing gears that leave the least carbon footprint behind.
The design aspect of Marmot is aesthetic than Patagonia, but there’s a reason behind Patagonia’s vintage-like pattern. It talks about being long-term oriented and manufacturing products, which are sustainable and environmentally friendly.
Everything the brand does, it does keeping our ecosystem in mind, and nothing can separate their business aspect from activism, as both go hand in hand.
The brand is the forerunner in bringing change in the industry and guiding it towards being more conservationist and recyclable. All the above-mentioned facts make them more popular among the audience than Marmot.
Now when you have camped outside multiple times using Marmot or Patagonia’s tent, or for that matter any of the brand. The product is going to face wear and tear eventually.
That doesn’t mean they don’t provide a warranty. Both the brands provide a manufacture warranty, which means they cover any defects found at the time of buying the product, or after using it for a couple of times.
The manufacturing warranty covers: Broken/sticky zippers, Velcro issues, Elastic hem cord issues/broken toggles, Broken stitching.
What it does not cover is: Normal wear & tear, Modifications, Negligence/Damage, Use for a purpose other than for which it was designed, UV damage.
Both companies also provide repair and service of their products at a cost. Once you send your product to them (at your expense), they will provide an estimated cost of repair. If approved, it usually takes 5 to 8 weeks for them to repair, and ship it back to you (at their expense).
Just like Patagonia, a large part of Marmot’s catalog is made out of nylon or polyester, and even they are focused on reducing the impact on the environment.
They use as little chemicals as possible during manufacturing and focus more on the natural ways of building products. To achieve this, they use EvoDry for PFC-free coating and Evo Featherless technology for eliminating direct bird-sourcing in their jackets.
In addition to it, Marmot even has a wide pool of technology, which they use to manufacture products. These are quite openly mentioned on their Amazon page and official website.
Patagonia is racing side by side as they were the change agents in the industry. A large part of their inventory is manufactured using recycled materials such as cotton, polyester, nylon, etc. So much so forth that even the rubber which they use for their suits are neoprene-free.
Neoprene is an environmentally damaging form of rubber and the company recognized that in 2016. On the year itself, they switched to Yulex natural rubber for production.
You can read more about the type of materials they use through their Amazon page, which carries charming insight into the brand and its philosophy.
Patagonia or Marmot, at the end of the day there’s not much that is separating the two brands. The later one has evolved and started inculcating more sustainable practices in their manufacturing process.
Perhaps the only thing standing in between is the price point, where, Patagonia is on an average priced $20 to 30 per product more than it’s a twin. But they do bring in their energetic and sporty activism side to the table.
You can read more on these brands on Amazon, and grab a value for money product. Most significantly, next time when you venture out to camp, have a reliable roof over your head.